Algorithm for checking if the game is won
I tried implementing a recursive depth first search on each player's occupied board spaces but it didn't work out. Without going into specifics, can you give us any hints or suggestions on the algorithm?

http://fairuse.stanford.edu
crash course: //www.utsystem.edu/ogc/Intellectualproperty/cprtindx.htm//
www.copyright.iupui.edu/staff5.htm
www.librarycopyrightalliance.org
http://librarycopyright.net/wordpress/
http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/
Hall Davidson: http://www.halldavidson.net/downloads.html#anchor923173
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo: A Fair(ly) Use Tale (uses Disney clips)

http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/copyright/index.cfm
www.loc.gov/copyright
fairuse.stanford.eduhttp://fairuse.stanford.edu
crash course: //www.utsystem.edu/ogc/Intellectualproperty/cprtindx.htm//
www.copyright.iupui.edu/staff5.htm

http://daf.csulb.edu/offices/vp/information_security/policies/copyright.html CSULB policies
http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/woissues/copyrightb/copyright.cfm http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/copyright/index.cfm
www.loc.gov/copyright
fairuse.stanford.edu

http://daf.csulb.edu/offices/vp/information_security/policies/copyright.html CSULB policies
www.**ala**.org/**ala**/washoff/woissues/**copyright**b/**copyright**.cfmhttp://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/woissues/copyrightb/copyright.cfm
www.loc.gov/copyright
fairuse.stanford.edu
crash
fairuse.stanford.edu
crash course: //www.utsystem.edu/ogc/Intellectualproperty/cprtindx.htm//
www.copyright.iupui.edu/staff5.htm
www.librarycopyrightalliance.org
http://librarycopyright.net/wordpress/
Hall
www.copyright.iupui.edu/staff5.htm
www.librarycopyrightalliance.org
http://librarycopyright.net/wordpress/
Hall Davidson: http://www.halldavidson.net/downloads.html#anchor923173
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo: A Fair(ly) Disney clips)
http://visalia.k12.ca.us/library/policies/copyright.htm
http://visalia.k12.ca.us/library/policies/copyright.htm thorough school copyright policies
For
For teachers: TEACH Act
http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/teachact.htm
http://www.copyright.com/Services/copyrightoncampus/basics/teach.html
http://www.ipreducation.com/
For
http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/teachact.htm
http://www.copyright.com/Services/copyrightoncampus/basics/teach.html
http://www.ipreducation.com/
For kids:
http://www.playitcybersafe.com/
http://www.playitcybersafe.com/
netiquette: www.schoolibrary.org/pub/newsletterpdf/cslanews_3_06.pdf
http://creativecommons.org Creative Commons licenses provide a flexible range of protections and freedoms for authors, artists, and educators.

wotr8ue9t8yw8http://daf.csulb.edu/offices/vp/information_security/policies/copyright.html CSULB policies
www.**ala**.org/**ala**/washoff/woissues/**copyright**b/**copyright**.cfm
www.loc.gov/copyright
fairuse.stanford.edu
crash course: //www.utsystem.edu/ogc/Intellectualproperty/cprtindx.htm//
www.copyright.iupui.edu/staff5.htm
www.librarycopyrightalliance.org
http://librarycopyright.net/wordpress/
Hall Davidson: http://www.halldavidson.net/downloads.html#anchor923173
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo: A Fair(ly) Use Tale (uses Disney clips)
http://visalia.k12.ca.us/library/policies/copyright.htm thorough school district copyright policies
For teachers: TEACH Act
http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/teachact.htm
http://www.copyright.com/Services/copyrightoncampus/basics/teach.html
http://www.ipreducation.com/
For kids:
http://www.playitcybersafe.com/
netiquette: www.schoolibrary.org/pub/newsletterpdf/cslanews_3_06.pdf
http://creativecommons.org Creative Commons licenses provide a flexible range of protections and freedoms for authors, artists, and educators.

wotr8ue9t8yw8

Here are some assessment tools and tips for integrating technology into the curriculum: http://www.csulb.edu/colleges/colled/pt3/resources.htm#assessment
Want to use wikis? Here is PowerPoint presentation introduction: {wikis.ppt}
srieert8eurg0sdf8g0ds8gu

Here are some assessment tools and tips for integrating technology into the curriculum: http://www.csulb.edu/colleges/colled/pt3/resources.htm#assessment
Want to use wikis? Here is PowerPoint presentation introduction: {wikis.ppt}

Shawn White won the gold medal at the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Games in snowboarding, even before he performed this amazing stunt. The 1260 degree flip stunt was performed on his second run, even after he had claimed the gold medal. Right before his second run, the commentators said, "Shawn White's Double McTwist would be the icing on this cake. Shawn White- the move that everybody has been talking about. The move that some have called 'The Big Mac,' 'The Big McTwist,' 'The Double McTwist'..." - notice all the McDonald's terms. As much as I enjoy watching Shawn White snowboard, I wish that he would have named his new and original trick anything else but something that sounds like something you can order at the golden arches.
Dorneman-Tamara
{YouTube Video}
So, I think everyone is slightly confused on exactly what mcdonaldization is. It is not McDonalds taking over the world or being advertised everywhere, but rather the conceptualization of the commodification of cultures through capitalism. McDonalds, is defined by American culture, and can thus take over entire markets, much like it has in many areas of the world. The example I provide above is also to demonstrate a form of McDonaldization. The NFL, a larger corporation is trying to take over the smaller groups of individuals trying to sell and provide to the local communities dedicated to the saints football team winning a super bowl. These local groups having created a spirit and community identity out of the phrase "who dat" sparked from the event of the saints football team, who usually does terrible throughout the history of the NFL, to bond a community to achieve success, the Lombardy Trophy to New Orleans, as well as a renewed spirit of community post the devastation of Hurricane Katrina. Saints arena was even a place where many people fled to after losing their homes in the devastation of the hurricane, creating deeper ties to the Saints success and community spirit. However, because capital is involved, and people are spending money, as well as the fact that to spread the message and phrase "who dat" (Remember to individuals dedicated to the New Orleans Saints success, and the greater bonding of post Katrina) requires money to grow and spread, the already larger established institutions also want to ride the train of success, and get their "cut". Because "who dat" uses images of the Saints, primarily the team logo, the NFL claims that it has rights to all the merchandise sold. The primary function and purpose of the phrase "who dat", in my opinion, was to create a bond between a community after the catastrophic events of hurricane Katrina, despite the fact it was born from the fans and acclaim of a football team. This is McDonaldization because the NFL is commodifying this community phrase for profit and attempting to take the money from the communities that created and grew the phrase.

{http://www.umich.edu/~sapac/sia/2007/Wakeboard%20Nebraska.jpg}
I can't beleive this picture! It totally objectifies women by claiming the only important part of these women are their bodies. By covering up their faces with brown bags they give the idea that they women are ugly and the only part the viewer of the picture needs to see are their breasts and stomachs. I am not sure if the wakeboard company, Nebraska Wakeboard, is trying to ilicit to the possible buyer of these boats or wakeboards that they will receive these girls or at least get their attention with the purchase of their porduct(s). This is just gross to me!
Kurkowski-Jessica

{wiki_3.jpg}
{wiki_3.jpg}
This picture, from "Che Men's Magazine", clearly represents the objectification of a women as nothing more than a game men play because there is a controller coming out of her belly button. This picture is portraying the image that men are and will always be dominant over women. They will always have the "controller" making the woman do any and everything they want her to do. The controller is like her umbilical chord; everyone is born with one therefore objectifying that all women were born to be controlled by men.
This woman is being portrayed as a sexual character and any man is able to play her any way he wants to. By the looks of this picture, it looks like she is already sweaty which probably means she just got finished with another man and is ready for the next. Woman are objectified as a toy and/or a game men can play and pass on to one another. [wiki assignment #3]
{439_objectification.jpg}
Women are objectified all the time; even more so in advertisement. With this particular ad it shows women to be in the likeness of luggage. All set up on the shelves for purchase. Portraying them as consumer products and that all women can be bought; all that needs to be known is the asking price or tag price. In our culture this is a huge topic. From women marrying for money and not love. Younger women marrying much older men for their money and to either learn to love them or just deal with them until they die and leave their widow with the initial fortune.
{http://www.umich.edu/~sapac/sia/2007/Wakeboard%20Nebraska.jpg}
I can't beleive this picture! It totally objectifies women by claiming the only important part of these women are their bodies. By covering up their faces with brown bags they give the idea that they women are ugly and the only part the viewer of the picture needs to see are their breasts and stomachs. I am not sure if the wakeboard company, Nebraska Wakeboard, is trying to ilicit to the possible buyer of these boats or wakeboards that they will receive these girls or at least get their attention with the purchase of their porduct(s). This is just gross to me!
Kurkowski-Jessica